| |
BGonline.org Forums
More doubles doubles
Posted By: Ian Shaw In Response To: More doubles doubles (Philippe Michel)
Date: Thursday, 15 November 2007, at 3:24 p.m.
I think it's essential to advance to the 23 point and to cover, so 11/9* is out.
After much looking around, I concur with Philippe. Only 62 and 53 hit a front man, and 62 would have hit the straggler anyway. Converting a double shot to a triple shot by splitting the outside men doesn't get a reward commensurate with the additional risk of being hit by White.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.