| |
BGonline.org Forums
Don't bother--Longer RO
Posted By: Neil Robins In Response To: Don't bother--Longer RO (eXtreme Gammon)
Date: Sunday, 30 September 2012, at 7:03 a.m.
Another minor issue with rolling for double and no double is that you can get chances to be best displayed seemingly fixed at 50% in the output when clearly the RO has one move ahead and the RO box was showing 57% or something like that.
Here both results come from the no double side with the RD for each move within around 0.007.
White is XG Roller+
score: 0
pip: 1207 point match pip: 89
score: 4
Blue is NeilXGID=-AaC-bCCE---a------cbbb-b-:1:-1:1:64:4:0:0:7:10 Blue to play 64
1. Rollout1 8/4 7/1 eq: +0.0582
Player:
Opponent:63.89% (G:9.58% B:0.15%)
36.11% (G:6.44% B:0.09%)Conf.: ±0.0017 (+0.0565...+0.0599) - [50.0%]
Duration: 54 minutes 32 seconds2. Rollout1 8/2* 6/2 eq: +0.0578 (-0.0004)
Player:
Opponent:65.05% (G:9.06% B:0.18%)
34.95% (G:7.74% B:0.11%)Conf.: ±0.0021 (+0.0558...+0.0599) - [50.0%]
Duration: 1 hour 05 minutes1 10368 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Rolled for both No double and Double
Dice Seed: 31247
First 2 moves: 4-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
Remaining moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG RollereXtreme Gammon Version: 2.03, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.