BGonline.org Forums

BQ: Stack'em or not? *** RO ***

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Monday, 26 November 2012, at 3:23 a.m.

In Response To: BQ: Stack'em or not? *** RO *** (leobueno)

You see what's happening here? You're under a threat of a blitz and 13/11 exposes a new blot and also places the back checker where it can be hit and then the 5 pt slot can be covered more easily when missed than if you more safely play 23 8.

Messages In This Thread

• BQ: Stack'em or not?
  leobueno -- Thursday, 11 August 2011, at 10:50 p.m.
  • BQ: Stack'em or not?
    Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 11 August 2011, at 10:58 p.m.
    • BQ: Stack'em or not?
      leobueno -- Thursday, 11 August 2011, at 11:00 p.m.
      • BQ: Stack'em or not?
        Timothy Chow -- Friday, 12 August 2011, at 12:09 a.m.
      • BQ: Stack'em or not?
        Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 12 August 2011, at 6:24 a.m.
  • 65R-55A-52
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Friday, 12 August 2011, at 2:33 a.m.
    • 65R-55A-52
      Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 16 August 2011, at 9:55 a.m.
      • 65R-55A-52
        Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 16 August 2011, at 3:15 p.m.
        • 65R-55A-52
          Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 16 August 2011, at 4:11 p.m.
  • BQ: Stack'em or not? *** RO ***
    leobueno -- Sunday, 25 November 2012, at 7:21 p.m.
    • BQ: Stack'em or not? *** RO ***
      neilkaz -- Monday, 26 November 2012, at 3:23 a.m.