BGonline.org Forums

EPC Confusion

Posted By: Casper van der Tak
Date: Sunday, 13 January 2013, at 1:24 p.m.

In Response To: EPC Confusion (AP)

I played around with this a bit, and EPC handles this pretty well I think - present position is no double, straggler on the 16 is initial double, straggler on the 15 is redouble, straggler on the 14 is pass.

Messages In This Thread

• EPC Confusion
  AP -- Saturday, 12 January 2013, at 10:03 p.m.
  • A Better Way than Hybridization of EPC
    mamabear -- Saturday, 12 January 2013, at 11:50 p.m.
    • A Better Way than Hybridization of EPC
      Casper van der Tak -- Sunday, 13 January 2013, at 10:22 a.m.
    • A Better Way than Hybridization of EPC
      AP -- Monday, 14 January 2013, at 4:28 a.m.
  • EPC Confusion
    Daniel Murphy -- Sunday, 13 January 2013, at 7:35 a.m.
  • EPC Confusion
    Rick Janowski -- Sunday, 13 January 2013, at 12:45 p.m.
  • EPC Confusion
    Casper van der Tak -- Sunday, 13 January 2013, at 1:24 p.m.
  • EPC Confusion
    John O'Hagan -- Sunday, 13 January 2013, at 9:40 p.m.
  • EPC Confusion NO MORE!
    AP -- Monday, 14 January 2013, at 4:38 a.m.
    • EPC Confusion NO MORE!
      Rick Janowski -- Monday, 14 January 2013, at 8:35 a.m.
    • EPC Confusion NO MORE!
      Michael Nielsen -- Monday, 14 January 2013, at 10:32 a.m.