BGonline.org Forums

EPC Confusion NO MORE!

Posted By: Michael Nielsen
Date: Monday, 14 January 2013, at 10:32 a.m.

In Response To: EPC Confusion NO MORE! (AP)

I have used this formula for a couple of years and it does work well. For the most part it does hit within .5. You can find some extreme positions where it is off by more or if you're unlucky it will be off by .5 in different directions on either side.

The GWC chart I hadn't seen before.

Messages In This Thread

• EPC Confusion
  AP -- Saturday, 12 January 2013, at 10:03 p.m.
  • A Better Way than Hybridization of EPC
    mamabear -- Saturday, 12 January 2013, at 11:50 p.m.
    • A Better Way than Hybridization of EPC
      Casper van der Tak -- Sunday, 13 January 2013, at 10:22 a.m.
    • A Better Way than Hybridization of EPC
      AP -- Monday, 14 January 2013, at 4:28 a.m.
  • EPC Confusion
    Daniel Murphy -- Sunday, 13 January 2013, at 7:35 a.m.
  • EPC Confusion
    Rick Janowski -- Sunday, 13 January 2013, at 12:45 p.m.
  • EPC Confusion
    Casper van der Tak -- Sunday, 13 January 2013, at 1:24 p.m.
  • EPC Confusion
    John O'Hagan -- Sunday, 13 January 2013, at 9:40 p.m.
  • EPC Confusion NO MORE!
    AP -- Monday, 14 January 2013, at 4:38 a.m.
    • EPC Confusion NO MORE!
      Rick Janowski -- Monday, 14 January 2013, at 8:35 a.m.
    • EPC Confusion NO MORE!
      Michael Nielsen -- Monday, 14 January 2013, at 10:32 a.m.