[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

E-Mail to Bill Davis on New Rules Questions

Posted By: Caryl Stephanson
Date: Monday, 14 January 2008, at 10:12 p.m.

In Response To: E-Mail to Bill Davis on New Rules Questions (Bill Riles)

1. If B chose to roll too quickly then yes make him pay the price of allowing A the chance to see his next roll. Only way people will roll properly is if there is a penalty.

2."Player B should return his dice to the table with the appropriate numbers and await Player A's completion of play." No fofeit, but I think Player A should get to decide whether B is stuck with that roll or not. It's a way to make people wait if they know they will be stuck with a crap roll. I reiterate: Only way people will roll properly is if there is a penalty.

3. a)Can't see anything else to do about the numbers. b)"But, again, I assume he has forfeited right to cube on his next roll?" I would say yes.

4)I think that's a perfect way to render a correct decision and personally would be very happy with that. However, when playing live I am very careful with my rolls being rolled at the right time (AFTER my opponent has picked up his dice). The only time I have ever rolled too fast is with a friend in a friendly game and at the end when it's a roll off and after I have seen his roll. Oh, and when partying and it doesn't matter to anyone and sometimes the dice are already blurry. :)

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.