| |
BGonline.org Forums
Nactation again...
Posted By: Stick In Response To: Nactation again... (Stein Kulseth)
Date: Saturday, 26 January 2008, at 9:12 p.m.
opening 34 which also are not best but still plausible
Plausible meaning a blunder? lol I'm not personally concerned with these, there are 4 main plays with an opening 43, 43D, 43S, 43Z, 43U. After that you fall into blunderville. I don't know the nactation for these 'other' plays offhand, maybe Nack has created symbols for them but we've never needed to use them because we're not concerned with plays that never arise.
or can be made at least remotely possible after an opponents opening roll where you can claim duplication or other minor issues as a justification
It would depend on the position. A lot of 2nd roll positions take on different nactation values according to the position. Give me a position and a reasonable play, I should be able to come up with the nactation.
Stick
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.