BGonline.org Forums

Dayton Doubles Disagreements

Posted By: Bill Riles
Date: Monday, 18 February 2008, at 1:56 p.m.

In Response To: Dayton Doubles Disagreements (Stick)

Gammon wins the match. The safe play leaves all builders on three points and a lot of bad rolls next time, though he could crunch slightly in the interim. I'm tempted to go for the kill with 10/1* looking for him to come in and crunch and, if he doesn't hit me, forcing the blot forward off the ace to ease my bear-in.

If he hits me he still has lots of work and I won't lose the match on the play.

Only mitigating circumstance is that opponent has been described as much weaker. Should I give him the opportunity for a great sequence?

10/1*.

Messages In This Thread

• Dayton Doubles Disagreements
  Stick -- Monday, 18 February 2008, at 11:01 a.m.
  • Dayton Doubles Disagreements
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Monday, 18 February 2008, at 11:39 a.m.
  • Dayton Doubles Disagreements
    Havard Raddum -- Monday, 18 February 2008, at 1:38 p.m.
  • Dayton Doubles Disagreements
    Bill Riles -- Monday, 18 February 2008, at 1:56 p.m.
  • Dayton Doubles Disagreements
    neilkaz -- Monday, 18 February 2008, at 3:24 p.m.
  • Dayton Doubles Disagreements
    Chuck Bower -- Monday, 18 February 2008, at 3:43 p.m.
  • Rollout
    Stick -- Wednesday, 20 February 2008, at 6:27 a.m.
    • Rollout
      Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 20 February 2008, at 1:46 p.m.
      • Rollout
        Stick -- Wednesday, 20 February 2008, at 1:53 p.m.