BGonline.org Forums

Not much equity at stake here but what would you play and why?

Posted By: Keene
Date: Monday, 27 October 2014, at 6:24 p.m.

In Response To: Not much equity at stake here but what would you play and why? (Michael Depreli)

4pt feels pretty automatic to me. Aside it being the next point you want to make, the 13/9 play strips the mid to no spares, so those are two pleasantly strong reasons for me to just make the 4. I wouldnt think any more about it, and if XG dinged me for it, I would call it a "lying bastard", and move on to the next, mentally noting that XG is wrong, and its not even worth a rollout.

K

Messages In This Thread

• Not much equity at stake here but what would you play and why?
  Michael Depreli -- Monday, 27 October 2014, at 7:57 a.m.
  • Not much equity at stake here but what would you play and why?
    ah_clem -- Monday, 27 October 2014, at 12:54 p.m.
  • Not much equity at stake here but what would you play and why?
    christian munk-christensen -- Monday, 27 October 2014, at 1:05 p.m.
  • Not much equity at stake here but what would you play and why?
    Stick -- Monday, 27 October 2014, at 1:38 p.m.
    • Not much equity at stake here but what would you play and why?
      neilkaz -- Monday, 27 October 2014, at 2:48 p.m.
  • Not much equity at stake here but what would you play and why?
    Timothy Chow -- Monday, 27 October 2014, at 3:35 p.m.
    • Not much equity at stake here but what would you play and why?
      Michael Depreli -- Tuesday, 28 October 2014, at 4:01 p.m.
  • Not much equity at stake here but what would you play and why?
    Keene -- Monday, 27 October 2014, at 6:24 p.m.
  • Not much equity at stake here but what would you play and why?
    HOMINID -- Monday, 27 October 2014, at 10:45 p.m.
  • Not much equity at stake here but what would you play and why?
    David Rennie -- Tuesday, 28 October 2014, at 7:44 p.m.