[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

No, I still didn't read carefully enough

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Tuesday, 13 January 2015, at 12:31 a.m.

In Response To: Blasphmey Blasphmey Desecration of XG (Daniel Murphy)

O.K., I see now that 6/1 came up when I said "Saving 6's and 5's so that you don't have to break the midpoint makes some sense, but it wouldn't explain why 6/1 is a blunder (apparently, although Stick didn't post a rollout for it) while 7/2 is not."

First of all, I wasn't saying that 6/1 really was a blunder, just that under the hypothesis that the XG results weren't garbage, then saving 6's and 5's would not explain why XG dings 6/1 but not 7/2.

Does that clarify? Or are you asserting that 6/1 really is a blunder and you want me to explain why? Then I'd revert to what I said before, that 6/1 isn't really a blunder, and that GNU's evaluation of –0.027 doesn't seem difficult to explain.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.