So this looks reasonable? I thought only in the Phil Simborg chouette would a player move TWO men to the 1-point with the hope of attracting a bad take on the subsequent roll. Please read David Rockwell's post for the likely explanation. (And yes, a rollout indicates sanity restored with the correct 8,3,5).
        
 
          
 | | White is Player 2
score: 0
pip: 115 | Unlimited Game
Jacoby Beaver | pip: 110
score: 0
Blue is Player 1 |
|
| XGID=-B--A-DbC-C-bBa---ababbb--:1:1:1:55:0:0:3:0:10 |
| Blue to play 55 |
| 1. | XG Roller++ | 13/8(2) 6/1(2) | eq: +0.973 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 77.51% (G:1.29% B:0.01%)
22.49% (G:0.50% B:0.01%) | |
|
| 2. | XG Roller++ | 13/8 13/3 10/5 | eq: +0.966 (-0.007) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 82.26% (G:0.75% B:0.00%)
17.74% (G:0.12% B:0.00%) | |
|
| 3. | XG Roller++ | 13/3(2) | eq: +0.966 (-0.007) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 80.76% (G:0.75% B:0.00%)
19.24% (G:0.19% B:0.00%) | |
|
| 4. | XG Roller++ | 13/8 13/3 6/1 | eq: +0.961 (-0.011) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 79.73% (G:1.09% B:0.00%)
20.27% (G:0.33% B:0.00%) | |
|
| 5. | XG Roller++ | 13/8(2) 10/5 6/1 | eq: +0.960 (-0.013) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 80.38% (G:1.20% B:0.00%)
19.62% (G:0.27% B:0.00%) | |
|
eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.10