BGonline.org Forums

When 52D or 54D became correct?

Posted By: Stick
Date: Wednesday, 8 April 2015, at 5:53 p.m.

In Response To: When 52D or 54D became correct? (Christian Munk-Christensen)

I'm not going to convert everything to MWC to figure out which score gives up the most match equity but I can tell you the emg figures run as high as .033 4a 2a and that most of the bigger errors will be playing against the 2a score which makes sense. Next up sizing the errors on average would probably be the post Crawford 'or greater scores' and playing against 3 away. Whether that's a big deal to you or not only you can know. I think giving up over .010 on the opening roll is a big deal unless I'm doing it for a specific purpose. (complicating)

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• When 52D or 54D became correct?
  mochy -- Wednesday, 8 April 2015, at 12:49 p.m.
  • When 52D or 54D became correct?
    Stick -- Wednesday, 8 April 2015, at 2:38 p.m.
    • When 52D or 54D became correct?
      Christian Munk-Christensen -- Wednesday, 8 April 2015, at 4:41 p.m.
      • When 52D or 54D became correct?
        Stick -- Wednesday, 8 April 2015, at 5:53 p.m.
      • 52D v split cost
        garyo -- Wednesday, 8 April 2015, at 5:53 p.m.
      • 54D v split cost
        garyo -- Wednesday, 8 April 2015, at 6:16 p.m.