BGonline.org Forums

Don't agree with xg...need explanation please

Posted By: Rick Janowski
Date: Monday, 11 July 2016, at 12:54 p.m.

In Response To: Don't agree with xg...need explanation please (Rick Janowski)

Forget the last paragraph, by the Jacoby box being ticked the settings you used will of course be equivalent to DMP.

Messages In This Thread

• Don't agree with xg...need explanation please
  Phil Simborg -- Monday, 11 July 2016, at 10:11 a.m.
  • Don't agree with xg...need explanation please
    Casper Van der Tak -- Monday, 11 July 2016, at 11:13 a.m.
  • Don't agree with xg...need explanation please
    Rick Janowski -- Monday, 11 July 2016, at 12:51 p.m.
    • Don't agree with xg...need explanation please
      Rick Janowski -- Monday, 11 July 2016, at 12:54 p.m.
      • Why those settings?
        Bob Koca -- Monday, 11 July 2016, at 3:51 p.m.
        • Why those settings?
          Rick Janowski -- Monday, 11 July 2016, at 4:30 p.m.
          • And what actually were his settings?
            Bob Koca -- Monday, 11 July 2016, at 5:44 p.m.
            • And what actually were his settings?
              Rick Janowski -- Monday, 11 July 2016, at 6:12 p.m.
        • Why those settings?
          Timothy Chow -- Monday, 11 July 2016, at 10:55 p.m.
          • Why those settings?
            Rick Janowski -- Tuesday, 12 July 2016, at 7:46 a.m.
          • Why those settings - binary logarithm of cube value.
            Rick Janowski -- Tuesday, 12 July 2016, at 8:11 a.m.
          • Why those settings?
            Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 12 July 2016, at 8:23 p.m.
            • Why those settings?
              Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 12 July 2016, at 10:59 p.m.
            • Why those settings?
              Chris Yep -- Wednesday, 13 July 2016, at 4:22 a.m.
  • Don't agree with xg...need explanation please
    neilkaz -- Monday, 11 July 2016, at 7:45 p.m.