BGonline.org Forums
Analysis using "Take Points in Money Games" Formula
Posted By: Bob Koca
Date: Thursday, 14 July 2016, at 1:42 a.m.
In Response To: Analysis using "Take Points in Money Games" Formula (Rick Janowski)
Is the cube efficiency difference obtained from unlimited games enough to explain the size of the DT equity differences at the 7a 4a score? I think the difference is significantly larger at score.
Messages In This Thread
- If you blunder here you may be in good company
Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 12 July 2016, at 11:08 p.m.
- If you blunder here you may be in good company
garyo -- Wednesday, 13 July 2016, at 12:07 a.m.
- If you blunder here you may be in good company
John O'Hagan -- Wednesday, 13 July 2016, at 12:28 a.m.
- If you blunder here you may be in good company
neilkaz -- Wednesday, 13 July 2016, at 1:06 a.m.
- Who can explain this position pair (RO info)
Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 13 July 2016, at 5:11 p.m.
- Who can explain this position pair (RO info)
Casper Van der Tak -- Wednesday, 13 July 2016, at 5:25 p.m.
- Who can explain this position pair (RO info)
Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 13 July 2016, at 5:28 p.m.
- Who can explain this position pair (RO info)
Rick Janowski -- Wednesday, 13 July 2016, at 6:36 p.m.
- My Theory
Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 13 July 2016, at 7:47 p.m.
- My Theory
Maik Stiebler -- Thursday, 14 July 2016, at 7:50 a.m.
- Analysis using "Take Points in Money Games" Formula
Rick Janowski -- Wednesday, 13 July 2016, at 10:09 p.m.
- Analysis using "Take Points in Money Games" Formula
Bob Koca -- Thursday, 14 July 2016, at 1:42 a.m.
- If you blunder here you may be in good company
Karol Szczerek -- Wednesday, 13 July 2016, at 3:04 p.m.
- If you blunder here you may be in good company
ah_clem -- Wednesday, 13 July 2016, at 4:12 p.m.
- Rollout
Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 14 July 2016, at 12:22 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.