BGonline.org Forums

Six-prime versus six-prime! At 3a7a no less

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Monday, 12 June 2017, at 1:36 p.m.

In Response To: Six-prime versus six-prime! At 3a7a no less (Michael)

Michael wrote:

Was he a weaker player to end up losing 4-0? If yes I wouldn't Double.

A weaker player (or even a not-so-weak player for that matter) might drop.

Messages In This Thread

• Six-prime versus six-prime! At 3a7a no less
  Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 11 June 2017, at 11:29 p.m.
  • Six-prime versus six-prime! At 3a7a no less
    scotty -- Monday, 12 June 2017, at 12:18 a.m.
    • Six-prime versus six-prime! At 3a7a no less
      scotty -- Monday, 12 June 2017, at 12:39 a.m.
      • Six-prime versus six-prime! At 3a7a no less
        Timothy Chow -- Monday, 12 June 2017, at 1:01 a.m.
        • Six-prime versus six-prime! At 3a7a no less
          scotty -- Monday, 12 June 2017, at 10:23 a.m.
  • Six-prime versus six-prime! At 3a7a no less
    neilkaz -- Monday, 12 June 2017, at 2:16 a.m.
  • Six-prime versus six-prime! At 3a7a no less
    Michael -- Monday, 12 June 2017, at 8:09 a.m.
    • Six-prime versus six-prime! At 3a7a no less
      Timothy Chow -- Monday, 12 June 2017, at 1:36 p.m.
      • Six-prime versus six-prime! At 3a7a no less
        Michael -- Monday, 12 June 2017, at 9:23 p.m.
        • Six-prime versus six-prime! At 3a7a no less
          Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 13 June 2017, at 8:26 p.m.
  • Six-prime versus six-prime! At 3a7a no less
    ah_clem -- Monday, 12 June 2017, at 8:24 p.m.
  • Rollout + some discussion
    Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 13 June 2017, at 12:05 a.m.