|
BGonline.org Forums
Gerard's paradox + position variant
Posted By: Carlo Melzi In Response To: What is Gerard's paradox? *NM* (Sean Garber)
Date: Wednesday, 11 October 2017, at 8:25 p.m.
Gerard's Paradox is mentioned in the book "How little we know about backgammon" by Danny Kleiman.
The name Gerard comes from Gerard Duguet-Grasser, a famous French player at the time I believe.
It basically states what others already wrote in this thread: in a 2aw-2aw score, you should always double as an underdog with market losers as long as you always have a take anyway on the next roll.
While originally stated at 2aw-2aw score, it happens also at other scores, as long as the cube action kills the cube.
I am coming to the conclusion that correct doubles below the minimum doubling point do always involve some form of Gerard's paradox. Do you agree?
Let's take a look at this variant:
White is Player 2
score: 9
pip: 6711 point match pip: 80
score: 4
Blue is Player 1XGID=-BBBCBB-----a----B-cbcbd--:0:0:1:00:4:9:0:11:10 Blue on roll, cube action?
Analyzed in XG Roller+ No double Double/Take Player Winning Chances: 55.90% (G:1.39% B:0.02%) 55.98% (G:1.28% B:0.01%) Opponent Winning Chances: 44.10% (G:0.23% B:0.00%) 44.02% (G:0.20% B:0.00%) Cubeless Equities +0.129 -0.024 Cubeful Equities No double: -0.056 (-0.032) Double/Take: -0.024 Double/Pass: +1.000 (+1.024) Best Cube action: Double / Take eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.10, MET: Kazaross XG2
This is again a proper initial cube even though GWC are much lower than the minimum doubling point. Now the proper following after a miss is often a Double/Pass. However, some form of Gerard's Paradox is still present, and probably this is what makes the double correct in the first place.
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.