| |
BGonline.org Forums
Can the method be adapted to give an earlier indication?
Posted By: Tenland In Response To: Criss-Cross Count (Nack Ballard)
Date: Friday, 30 November 2018, at 6:11 p.m.
@Nack and maxim, and any other genii out there:
As I am working on transitioning from Urquhart to criss-cross, I realize that there is one aspect of the Urquhart method I really miss:
It is sometimes very fast to just do the initial full crossover step, end up at, say, 18 pips ahead, give the near triads and mid and sixpoint stacks a quick glance and realize that there's no way I am not going to be up in the race. I have found this efficient especially when up or down in the race is the main thing to be established or when low on time.
With criss cross, granted, we have a good estimate before the final step, but not really earlier than that, since the "number of checkers on opp's side"-adjustment is very significant.
Do you have ideas or hints as to how I can get a faster approximation out of the criss-cross method?
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.