[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

11/4 is not an error (IMO)

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Wednesday, 22 November 2023, at 3:00 a.m.

In Response To: 11/4 is not an error (IMO) (svilo)

Nobody (that I know of) is claiming that there are no mistakes (as revealed by modern bots) in Paul's book. Jeremy published many of them. I hope you are fair, as Jeremy was.

Implying (let alone asserting) that 11/4 is a mistake might make you look good to your readers because it appears that you uncovered an error that nobody else did. However, I don't think that implication is authentic, once you have been shown how 11/4 is not a mistake (except by insisting on an assumption that you want to believe but can't be sure was intended).

Perhaps you are trying to be fair, and I was simply unable to convince you that 11/4 is not an irrefutable mistake -- that at least there's enough doubt not to claim or imply that it is. Well, okay, I did my best, enough said.

Good luck with your publication(s), sincerely.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.