| |
BGonline.org Forums
AI: The x'000 year-old game of competitive backgammon may well have to change...
Posted By: Sebalotek In Response To: AI: The x'000 year-old game of competitive backgammon may well have to change... (Bob Koca)
Date: Wednesday, 3 July 2024, at 8:36 p.m.
Yes I can.
But please, first, is it fair and sensible for me to ask you to give a clear response to my earlier, straightforward question?
>> Please let me know how you would categorise the output for this random case.
:> Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Neutral, Agree, Strongly AgreeIf your answer is anything other than the 2x forms of Agreement, please could you justify your reasoning with logic & briefly explain exactly what non-trivial things are incorrect or missing from the AI response (if any).
Hopefully there will be none, but if not, I can then at least try to fix the AI's logic.
Also, please could you formulate your new query in the format I strongly recommended earlier to protect against GIGO:
>> N.B. Even though my AI is very capable at processing natural language, it is highly recommended that scenarios are presented via text input in a clear, complete and structured manner (just as players hopefully would to a human TD) for even better results. i.e. a clear, comprehensive, numbered, chronological sequence of events e.g. 1... 2... 3... etc.
Finally, before I run it, is your 2nd question well-formed and complete?
I don't know much about Adderall, but don't some people use some drugs for legitimate health reasons? i.e. beta-blockers for heart conditions, Ritalin or Adderall for ADHD.
Do you know the person's (supposedly) private medical history? Whether yes or no, this extremely relevant information should be provided to the AI in the initial problem description (1,2,3... etc). Please do resubmit your Q.2 in the requested format.
Thanks!
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.