| |
BGonline.org Forums
Is 3-ply GNU-bg's best backgame player?
Posted By: Daniel Murphy In Response To: Is 3-ply GNU-bg's best backgame player? (Mislav Radica)
Date: Friday, 10 October 2008, at 4:13 p.m.
Matt's currently rolling out positions from Advanced Backgammon. When he gets to problems 163-200, we'll have 41 backgame positions for which we can compare evaluations (Chuck's question) to however many rollouts with different settings might be run for the problems.
Of particular interest, perhaps, are:
165 BR says D/P, BT says ND/T 169 BR hits none, Snowie eval hits 4, Snowie rollout hits none 170 BR says ND/Take (no beaver), BT says ND/Beaver 171 BR says D/P, BT says D/T 177C BR says D/T, BT says ND 178 BR says D/P, BT says D/T 185 BR says bar/22, CBR says bar/23, and Trice wrote about it in Chicago Point Sept. 1992. 188 BR says 6/2 6/3, CBR says 24/17, my Gnubg 2-ply rollout says 5/1 5/2 198 BR says D/T, CBR says No Redouble 199B BR says D/P, CBR says No Redouble BR = Bill Robertie, BT = Backgammon Today with Snowie rollouts, CBR = Classic Backgammon Revisited with Snowie rollouts
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.