BGonline.org Forums
Snowie's error rate ranges and names revisited
Posted By: Stick
Date: Friday, 5 December 2008, at 1:02 a.m.
In Response To: Snowie's error rate ranges and names revisited (Mislav Radica)
For matches of any length there are only four divisions I care about.
- 0-2.0 = well fuckin' played
- 2-3.5 = pretty damn good
- 3.5-4 = acceptable
- 4+++ = why suck?
Stick
Messages In This Thread
- Snowie's error rate ranges and names revisited
Mislav Radica -- Friday, 5 December 2008, at 12:21 a.m.
- Ok, extra-terrestrial should exist
Mislav Radica -- Friday, 5 December 2008, at 12:38 a.m.
- Snowie's error rate ranges and names revisited
Stick -- Friday, 5 December 2008, at 1:02 a.m.
- Snowie's error rate ranges and names revisited
Maik Stiebler -- Friday, 5 December 2008, at 11:17 a.m.
- Snowie's error rate ranges and names revisited
Keene -- Friday, 5 December 2008, at 4:30 p.m.
- Snowie's error rate ranges and names revisited
phlegethos -- Thursday, 11 December 2008, at 3:35 p.m.
- Error rate ranges and names revisited
Leonardo Jerkovic -- Saturday, 5 March 2011, at 6:35 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.