| |
BGonline.org Forums
Further thought
Posted By: Chuck Bower In Response To: Further thought (Matt Cohn-Geier)
Date: Monday, 4 May 2009, at 11:41 p.m.
Last time I'll ever compliment you; t/f you very much! :)
Hitting loose low in backgames is thematic, as is not covering the blot. I see no compelling reason to sway from that principle here.
John's play (repeated by others) makes sense, too. It's a compromise between keeping your builders for the full prime in place and not sending extra opp checkers back. And that's why rew found this position worth posting, I'm guessing.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.