BGonline.org Forums

Chicago Conso Semis 22

Posted By: Chuck Bower
Date: Friday, 5 June 2009, at 4:43 p.m.

In Response To: Chicago Conso Semis 22 (Chuck Bower)

Didn't see the 11/3 option until reading the other responses. Don't like spare on the 9-point after this play, now that I look at it. But it is purer than 6/2 and safer than my move, so maybe the location of that checker is minor compared to these flaws.

Doubles partner, keep arguing 'cause I'm not giving in yet.

Messages In This Thread

• Chicago Conso Semis 22
  Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 5 June 2009, at 2:58 a.m.
  • Chicago Conso Semis 22
    Petter Bengtsson -- Friday, 5 June 2009, at 3:14 a.m.
  • Chicago Conso Semis 22
    Marv Porten -- Friday, 5 June 2009, at 4:41 a.m.
  • Chicago Conso Semis 22
    Tad Bright -- Friday, 5 June 2009, at 7:55 a.m.
    • Chicago Conso Semis 22
      Jake Jacobs -- Saturday, 6 June 2009, at 4:28 a.m.
      • Chicago Conso Semis 22
        Tad Bright -- Saturday, 6 June 2009, at 3:58 p.m.
  • Chicago Conso Semis 22
    pontiac -- Friday, 5 June 2009, at 8:03 a.m.
  • Chicago Conso Semis 22
    Chuck Bower -- Friday, 5 June 2009, at 4:29 p.m.
    • Chicago Conso Semis 22
      Chuck Bower -- Friday, 5 June 2009, at 4:43 p.m.
  • Chicago Conso Semis 22
    garyo -- Friday, 5 June 2009, at 6:26 p.m.
    • some bot info
      garyo -- Saturday, 6 June 2009, at 1:06 p.m.
    • Chicago Conso Semis 22
      John O'Hagan -- Saturday, 6 June 2009, at 3:11 p.m.
  • Chicago Conso Semis 22
    John O'Hagan -- Saturday, 6 June 2009, at 2:09 p.m.
  • Chicago Conso Semis 22 Rollout
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Saturday, 6 June 2009, at 4:06 p.m.