BGonline.org Forums
One more piece of evidence that shouldn't be ignored
Posted By: Chuck Bower
Date: Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 7:06 p.m.
In Response To: GNUBG RO Blunder(BGB/XBG right) (neilkaz)
GNU-bg doesn't like breaking the prime at 2-ply, 3-ply, or 4-ply with this roll. So the 'repeated error' theory is losing its teeth.
Messages In This Thread
- GNUBG RO Blunder(BGB/XBG right)
Andreas -- Sunday, 28 June 2009, at 1:02 p.m.
- GNUBG RO Blunder(BGB/XBG right)
Neil Robins -- Sunday, 28 June 2009, at 1:52 p.m.
- GNUBG RO Blunder(BGB/XBG right)
Robert-Jan Veldhuizen (Zorba) -- Sunday, 28 June 2009, at 1:59 p.m.
- GNUBG RO Blunder(BGB/XBG right)
neilkaz -- Monday, 29 June 2009, at 2:34 p.m.
- GNUBG RO Blunder(BGB/XBG right)
Maik Stiebler -- Monday, 29 June 2009, at 3:08 p.m.
- Would it help...?
Chuck Bower -- Monday, 29 June 2009, at 5:01 p.m.
- One more piece of evidence that shouldn't be ignored
Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 30 June 2009, at 7:06 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.