[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

illegally borne off checker rule

Posted By: Chuck Bower
Date: Saturday, 22 August 2009, at 5:44 p.m.

In Response To: illegally borne off checker rule (Rich Munitz)

In the posted position, the player on roll is in fact eligible to bear off checkers and it was unquestionably his intent to bear off the checker, but I see no ambiguity in the rule....

And I thought Gregg had a temporary circuit disconnect but now I see another rational+reasonable person agrees. (I think Gregg has sinced changed his mind.) Now I'm 100% convinced:

the rule is Fouled Up Beyond All Recognition.

BTW, I'm curious. If this happened in a match you were playing, and assuming the perpetrator (who bore off the checker) was neither a friend nor an enemy of yours, would you accept the legal play and then (if he never bore off any of the remaining 14) accept the gammon?

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.