[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

ruling in Madison

Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Friday, 11 September 2009, at 5:58 a.m.

In Response To: ruling in Madison (Gregg Cattanach)

It IS part of the game whether you want it to be or not. People WILL make illegal plays, inadvertently, (99% of the time, IMO) or not. The question is what should be the opponent's correct response? No penalty for the illegal player at all by letting him correct it every time (legal plays)? Or a potential penalty with the current rules. Which makes more sense?

The current penalty doesn't work. There is actually an incentive to make an advantageous illegal play if you are on a clock since you get more time. And it's always at least break even to make an advantageous illegal play in unclocked matches.

Wrong, wrong, wrong. An attempt to gain equity by an illegal play will almost always be caught and reversed.

This is definitely not true. I know of several advantageous illegal plays that occurred this weekend that stood. One happened in a doubles match. Two of the players involved were Giants. All of the spectators saw it (about 10 or so), apparently none of the players did.

A successful attempt to 'not see' a bad illegal play will NEVER be caught and reversed with a 'legal plays' rule.

What if spectators could kibitz? I don't know if anyone wants to codify that in the rules but I don't have a problem with people speaking up if I am playing someone I know has a legal moves agreement (Stick, Neil, Falafel, etc.).

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.