[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Giant 32 Criteria - Additional Thoughts

Posted By: Chiva Tafazzoli
Date: Saturday, 12 September 2009, at 4:56 p.m.

In Response To: Giant 32 Criteria (Perry Gartner)

I don´t think that´s it´s enough to consider only tournament results. IMHO, in order to be a GIANT of BACKGAMMON, one has to be a complete (and of course active) player. So, all facets should be considered, i.e. offline tournament results, money play and online performance, since all 3 are ascpects of "backgammon" today.

Since the Giants vote also is a kind of popularity contest and a "Hall of Fame", I also vouch for a list (separate or integrated within the Giants list) of people who have left substantial footsteps in the sand of backgammon (articles, books, software contribution, promotion, etc.)

Just a thought.... Inputs welcome.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.