| |
BGonline.org Forums
Giant 32 Criteria - Additional Thoughts
Posted By: Chiva Tafazzoli In Response To: Giant 32 Criteria (Perry Gartner)
Date: Saturday, 12 September 2009, at 4:56 p.m.
I don´t think that´s it´s enough to consider only tournament results. IMHO, in order to be a GIANT of BACKGAMMON, one has to be a complete (and of course active) player. So, all facets should be considered, i.e. offline tournament results, money play and online performance, since all 3 are ascpects of "backgammon" today.
Since the Giants vote also is a kind of popularity contest and a "Hall of Fame", I also vouch for a list (separate or integrated within the Giants list) of people who have left substantial footsteps in the sand of backgammon (articles, books, software contribution, promotion, etc.)
Just a thought.... Inputs welcome.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.