BGonline.org Forums
Sry for a confusing title..of course anchor with a 3, but the roll is 65
Posted By: Stein Kulseth
Date: Monday, 21 September 2009, at 12:00 p.m.
In Response To: Sry for a confusing title..of course anchor with a 3, but the roll is 65 *NM* (neilkaz)
I think the title was genius - reducing the problem to what really is the difference between the plays.
Messages In This Thread
- Build with the 3 or advance the last checker?
neilkaz -- Monday, 21 September 2009, at 1:10 a.m.
- Build with the 3 or advance the last checker?
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Monday, 21 September 2009, at 1:49 a.m.
- Build with the 3 or advance the last checker?
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Monday, 21 September 2009, at 1:51 a.m.
- Build with the 3 or advance the last checker?
David Rockwell -- Monday, 21 September 2009, at 2:44 a.m.
- Build with the 3 or advance the last checker?
Daniel Murphy -- Monday, 21 September 2009, at 6:02 a.m.
- Build with the 3 or advance the last checker?
misja -- Monday, 21 September 2009, at 9:43 a.m.
- Build with the 3 or advance the last checker?
Elliott Winslow -- Monday, 21 September 2009, at 11:28 a.m.
- Build with the 3 or advance the last checker?
Stein Kulseth -- Monday, 21 September 2009, at 12:00 p.m.
- Build with the 3 or advance the last checker?
Ian Shaw -- Monday, 21 September 2009, at 1:17 p.m.
- Build with the 3 or advance the last checker?
Chuck Bower -- Monday, 21 September 2009, at 6:27 p.m.
- OTB...
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 22 September 2009, at 12:01 p.m.
- OTB...
jdg -- Tuesday, 22 September 2009, at 2:29 p.m.
- RO's
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 22 September 2009, at 10:04 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.