BGonline.org Forums

Gammon %

Posted By: Stein Kulseth
Date: Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 7:50 a.m.

In Response To: Gammon % (neilkaz)

It used to be common wisdom, or at least what Kit was saying (which should satisfiy the "wisdom" part), that the bots achieved higher error rates than most humans. Thus a bot-generated MET might still not be the best for OTB play.

Do you know whether the above assumption still holds, or whether we have learned enough from the bots to achieve similar gammon rates?

Messages In This Thread

• MET update
  David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 22 September 2009, at 3:40 p.m.
  • MET update
    neilkaz -- Tuesday, 22 September 2009, at 3:59 p.m.
    • Gammon %
      Frankie D -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 12:00 a.m.
      • Gammon %
        neilkaz -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 1:07 a.m.
        • Gammon %
          Stein Kulseth -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 7:50 a.m.
          • Gammon %
            Havard Raddum -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 10:31 a.m.
          • Gammon %
            Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 12:10 p.m.
          • Gammon %
            Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 1:48 p.m.
          • Gammon %
            David Rockwell -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 1:55 p.m.
  • MET update
    John O'Hagan -- Tuesday, 22 September 2009, at 4:29 p.m.
    • MET update
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 22 September 2009, at 5:04 p.m.
  • MET update
    Tom Keith -- Tuesday, 22 September 2009, at 4:33 p.m.
    • MET update
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 22 September 2009, at 4:55 p.m.
      • MET update
        NJ -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 11:15 a.m.
        • MET update
          Maik Stiebler -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 1:20 p.m.
          • MET update
            NJ -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 4:14 p.m.
          • Link doesn't work on any of the 3 comps I tried *NM*
            neilkaz -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 5:29 p.m.
            • did you try right-click -> save target as... ? *NM*
              Maik Stiebler -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 7:34 p.m.
              • TY that saved it,,but how do I look at it to compare to g11 and other MET's?
                neilkaz -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 7:39 p.m.
                • TY that saved it,,but how do I look at it to compare to g11 and other MET's?
                  Maik Stiebler -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 8:01 p.m.
                  • Thx *NM*
                    neilkaz -- Thursday, 24 September 2009, at 12:19 a.m.
    • MET update
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 22 September 2009, at 7:10 p.m.
  • MET update
    NJ -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 8:17 a.m.
    • MET update
      Maik Stiebler -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 8:30 a.m.
      • MET update
        NJ -- Wednesday, 23 September 2009, at 11:03 a.m.