| |
BGonline.org Forums
Any reason to roll out multiple-of-36 games?
Posted By: Rich Munitz In Response To: Any reason to roll out multiple-of-36 games? (Frank Berger)
Date: Monday, 28 September 2009, at 6:47 p.m.
Wouldn't counting the non-doubles twice ultimately reduce the variance because it would allow more complete sets of 36 or 1296 rolls to be done with the same amount of processing?
For one thing, you could actually provide regular distribution of the first 3 rolls with only 9261 games instead of 46656.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.