[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Another Tough Chouette Ruling

Posted By: Daniel Murphy
Date: Friday, 23 October 2009, at 3:18 p.m.

In Response To: Another Tough Chouette Ruling (Phil Simborg)

Phil: We have MANY RULES that are not explicit. Another example: the Crawford Rule. You cannot double on the Crawford game. But some people do, and there is disagreement, even between tournament directors, on whether a double that is accepted should count. Why not state that the double does not count even if mistakenly given and mistakenly accepted?

I believe that in an issue of Flint there was what I thought was an authoritative statement by CJC that Crawford game doubles are invalid, period. This (following DBgF's example) is a simple and excellent interpretation of the Crawford rule. Why would other ABT directors not be following it?

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.