| |
BGonline.org Forums
3-away 7-away cube action
Posted By: Chuck Bower In Response To: 3-away 7-away cube action (Daniel Murphy)
Date: Monday, 26 October 2009, at 9:40 p.m.
(From memory:) Pass for 15.5%. Take and win for 35%. Take and lose simple for 9%. Take and lose G for 0%.
Prorate the takes (about 4::5 looks not far off) for 5% MWC. Risk 10.5% out of 30% for a worthless cube takepoint of 10.5/30 = 21/60 = 7/20 = 35%.
If the cube comes back to 4, Blue passes for 65%; takes and wins for the match (100%); takes and loses simple for 50%; takes and loses gammon for the match (0%). Prorate the take+lose at 25% gammon fraction (WAG) so taking and losing is worth 37.5%. Risk 65 - 37.5 = 27.5 out of a possible 100 - 37.5 = 62.5 means the takepoint at 4 will be 27.5/62.5 = 55/125 = 11/25 or 44%.
So now White's perfect cube efficiency takepoint is 56% of 35% ~ 19.5%. With realistic cube we now (at least think we) know that the takepoint is bounded below by 19.5% and above by 35%. But how much cube efficiency is there?
I used to think it was more than the typical 70% at a score like this until a position a month or so ago squelched that thought. When cube owner is going to rewind on just a sneeze then maybe cube efficiency is considerably worse than typical.... (Recall White will risk between 5% and 9% to gain somewhere between 15% and 25%.)
If cube efficiency is 50% for White then s/he needs about 27% or so to take here. I do think White has that.
Blue might have a cube here, particularly if the cube efficiency is worse than I assumed. I'd probably still be afraid to ship it, though.
N+T.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.