| |
BGonline.org Forums
Consequences of touch/move
Posted By: dlevy In Response To: Onetime shuffle rule (Nack Ballard)
Date: Wednesday, 11 November 2009, at 10:50 p.m.
I played a bunch of online matches today and paid attention to times when I moved and reset. There were few (other than online mis-clicks which won't happen over the board). I found two categories. (1) Large doubles where the resulting positions were so different strategically that I wanted to look at both position. (2) Counting plays -- how many shots? how many blotting numbers? OTB, I would add reaching a position that was easier for pip counting.
If these were taken away would I miss them? No. It would slow me down a bit, but only on plays that I was taking time anyway.
I still think that eliminating illegal plays as a result of reshuffling would outweigh whatever costs.
The only downside is a favorite BG story could not recur. Las Vegas 1982. Semi finals of the main event. San Francisco club director Ralph Powell against Florida expert Art Dickman. Ralph, having hit a checker late in the bearoff, had a checker on the bar against a no-point board. He shuffled his checkers around so much that when he finally moved, he left the checker on the bar. Dickman accepted the move and the same thing happened on Ralph's next roll. This makes Ralph the only player I know to fan twice on a no-point board.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.