| |
BGonline.org Forums
Onetime shuffle rule
Posted By: Steve Mellen In Response To: Onetime shuffle rule (Nack Ballard)
Date: Thursday, 12 November 2009, at 6:43 p.m.
The doubling cube also brought an added layer of strategy and complexity to the game itself. Some people may not have liked that, but the point is that the doubling cube had a clear upside as well as a downside. The upside of the touch-move rule is... in the one match in 20 where your opponent is obnoxious about shuffling the checkers and it becomes difficult to reconstruct the original position, that won't happen any more.
You could envision people saying, "Hey, if this doubling cube thing catches on, it could add a lot of excitement and bring a lot more players into the game." You could envision people saying, "If chess clocks become standard, matches will finish in a reasonable time and maybe more people will be interested in coming to tournaments." In terms of touch-move... do we really imagine that a nontrivial number of people will be drawn to play in events because there's no more checker shuffling?
Every proposed rule change has a potential downside, you're 100% right about that. But you have to weigh the downside against the upside, and one reason I'm dubious about this proposal is that I just don't see a very big one. At best it seems like a very marginal benefit.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.