BGonline.org Forums
44 to play vs potential backgame
Posted By: John O'Hagan
Date: Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 2:00 a.m.
In Response To: 44 to play vs potential backgame (Adam Versaw)
I think it's best just to make the 5-point. Pointing on the deuce puts these two men out of play and will probably result in a well-timed backgame. Making the 5 leaves lots of shots/blots but you've got a 3/1 inner board advantage, being hit could help your timing, and Blue is taking a big risk if he hits with a 5.
Messages In This Thread
- 44 to play vs potential backgame
Adam Versaw -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 12:52 a.m.
- 44 to play vs potential backgame
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 1:21 a.m.
- 44 to play vs potential backgame
Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 1:28 a.m.
- 44 to play vs potential backgame
John O'Hagan -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 2:00 a.m.
- 44 to play vs potential backgame
Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 4:32 a.m.
- 44 to play vs potential backgame
Keene -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 4:43 a.m.
- rollout, not that i agree
Adam Versaw -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 2:08 p.m.
- Since you don't seem to mind points 6 apart...
Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 3:15 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.