[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

OLM Su 12/27/09

Posted By: Jason Lee
Date: Monday, 28 December 2009, at 4:52 a.m.

In Response To: OLM Su 12/27/09 (Jason Lee)

I think 4(2) is mandatory... after making the two point, we desperately need a better inside point. Then what? Either 11(2) or 6(2). 11(2) leaves a position that looks ugly... we own the 2 point and the 8 point and some stripped points in between. 6(2) at least gives us some flexibility -- we may need to break the 8 point later on, but it might be necessary.

8/4(2)

JLee

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.