BGonline.org Forums

MET - question for Neil

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 4:46 p.m.

In Response To: MET - question for Neil (neilkaz)

I trust XG more too, but the size of the discrepancy bothers me. Also, I don't know how XG works ATS which is a potential issue. From what I have heard, it works well ATS, but I would like to test that myself.

And, I failed to see the obvious on the MET question. Thanks.

Messages In This Thread

• 51S-62 at GG revisited
  David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 3:32 p.m.
  • MET - question for Neil
    David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 3:33 p.m.
    • MET - question for Neil
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 4:18 p.m.
      • MET - question for Neil
        David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 4:46 p.m.
        • MET - question for Neil
          neilkaz -- Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 6:01 p.m.
  • 51S-62 at GG revisited
    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 10:34 p.m.
    • 51S-62 at GG revisited
      Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 5:46 a.m.
      • 51S-62 at GG revisited
        David Rockwell -- Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 6:23 a.m.
        • 51S-62 at GG revisited
          Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 7:02 a.m.
    • 51S-62 at GG revisited XG 4ply being extended
      neilkaz -- Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 12:49 p.m.
  • XG 4 ply RO with 10k for the top two plays
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 11:05 p.m.
    • XG 4 ply RO with 10k for the top two plays
      Stick -- Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 11:27 p.m.
      • XG 4 ply RO with 10k for the top two plays
        neilkaz -- Thursday, 7 January 2010, at 1:54 p.m.
  • We will hopefully get closer to the truth in a couple years
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 11:15 p.m.