BGonline.org Forums

51S-62 at GG revisited

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 6:23 a.m.

In Response To: 51S-62 at GG revisited (Daniel Murphy)

.0098 is huge from the perspective that there is some erronious calculations involved. I probably won't have time to look at the responses - feel free to jump into it.

Messages In This Thread

• 51S-62 at GG revisited
  David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 3:32 p.m.
  • MET - question for Neil
    David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 3:33 p.m.
    • MET - question for Neil
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 4:18 p.m.
      • MET - question for Neil
        David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 4:46 p.m.
        • MET - question for Neil
          neilkaz -- Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 6:01 p.m.
  • 51S-62 at GG revisited
    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 5 January 2010, at 10:34 p.m.
    • 51S-62 at GG revisited
      Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 5:46 a.m.
      • 51S-62 at GG revisited
        David Rockwell -- Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 6:23 a.m.
        • 51S-62 at GG revisited
          Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 7:02 a.m.
    • 51S-62 at GG revisited XG 4ply being extended
      neilkaz -- Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 12:49 p.m.
  • XG 4 ply RO with 10k for the top two plays
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 11:05 p.m.
    • XG 4 ply RO with 10k for the top two plays
      Stick -- Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 11:27 p.m.
      • XG 4 ply RO with 10k for the top two plays
        neilkaz -- Thursday, 7 January 2010, at 1:54 p.m.
  • We will hopefully get closer to the truth in a couple years
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 11:15 p.m.