| |
BGonline.org Forums
SNOWIE ROLLOUTS
Posted By: Matt Ryder In Response To: SNOWIE ROLLOUTS (Ray Kershaw)
Date: Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 9:49 p.m.
I'm not sure I fully understand Tim's position here, but I reiterate that it's always possible to derive the cubeless equity from the six probabilities, as these always describe cubeless outcomes.
Here's an example (from XG not Snowie, but I assure you the principle is exactly the same):
is Player 2
score: 0
pip: 55 1
![]()
![]()
Money session pip: 69
score: 0
is Player 1
XGID=-BCCCC-------------e-ccabA:0:0:1:43:0:0:0:0:10 to play 43
1. XG Roller+ Cannot move eq: -1.000
Player:
Opponent:12.57% (G:0.00% B:0.00%)
87.43% (G:1.60% B:0.02%)eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.11
Here we see a cubeful equity of -1 (which makes sense as black will turn the cube next turn and it's a clear pass). Note however the six listed probabilities belie this cubeful reality. They suggest that white still has a 12.57% win chance and that black has ancillary gammon (1.6%) and backgammon (0.02%) chances. That's because these numbers are cubeless estimates (and only make sense if the cube is dead).
Cubeless equity for white in this position may be calculated as:
(0.1257 - 0.8743) + (0 - 0.016) + (0 - 0.002) = -0.7666
Hope that clarifies things!
Matt.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.