| |
BGonline.org Forums
XG 4 ply RO with 10k for the top two plays
Posted By: neilkaz In Response To: 51S-62 at GG revisited (David Rockwell)
Date: Wednesday, 6 January 2010, at 11:05 p.m.
This still shows that running seems correct. I don't know why GNU's results are different. I do note that slotty plays tend to fare better with GNU than with XG or Snowie.
Perhaps GNU doesn't defend vs a backgame that well at this score, or perhaps XG doesn't play the backgame that well at this score. However, 51S-62$ is a LONG way from becoming a backgame. But one thing is clear to me and that it that I certainly prefer to use the highest strength bot settings reasonably possible for the RO. We can again see from today's new Depreli test posting that XG 4 ply moves the pieces clearly better than GNU 2 ply.
is Player 2
score: 1
pip: 1612 point match
Crawfordpip: 167
score: 0
is Player 1
XGID=-aa---E-C---dE---d-e----B-:0:0:1:62:0:1:1:2:10 to play 62
1. Rollout1 24/16 eq: +0.175
Player:
Opponent:48.15% (G:10.69% B:1.17%)
51.85% (G:18.48% B:2.34%)Conf: ± 0.003 (+0.172...+0.178)
Duration: 17 hours 01 minute 10 seconds2. Rollout1 13/5 eq: +0.172 (-0.003)
Player:
Opponent:46.13% (G:12.51% B:1.27%)
53.87% (G:20.89% B:3.97%)Conf: ± 0.003 (+0.169...+0.175)
Duration: 18 hours 36 minutes 41 seconds3. Rollout2 13/11 8/2* eq: +0.168 (-0.007)
Player:
Opponent:46.12% (G:12.34% B:1.24%)
53.88% (G:21.95% B:4.23%)Conf: ± 0.004 (+0.164...+0.172)
Duration: 9 hours 45 minutes 17 seconds4. Rollout2 24/18 13/11 eq: +0.160 (-0.014)
Player:
Opponent:47.39% (G:10.71% B:1.26%)
52.61% (G:19.29% B:2.65%)Conf: ± 0.004 (+0.156...+0.164)
Duration: 8 hours 34 minutes 32 seconds1 10368 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves and cube decisions: 4 ply
2 5184 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves and cube decisions: 4 plyeXtreme Gammon Version: 1.11, MET: GnuBG 11 point
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.