BGonline.org Forums

Naccel 2 -- post #4

Posted By: Ian Shaw
Date: Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 11:13 a.m.

In Response To: Naccel 2 -- post #4 (Nack Ballard)

Thanks once more for the explanations. The method you demonstrated is certainly simpler than what I came up with.

I was practising Naccel by doing a count before I rolled on every move of a game against gnubg. I found this one quite tricky. It's also a position where one might realistically need a good count, since I was considering whether to recube.

gnubg	81
ian	52
Position ID: c3cHAED3fRAgAA Match ID: UQkAAAAAAAAA

Messages In This Thread

• Naccel 2 -- post #4
  Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 13 January 2010, at 2:20 a.m.
  • Naccel 2 -- post #4 - 2 new positions
    Lucky Jim -- Wednesday, 13 January 2010, at 10:27 p.m.
    • Naccel 2 -- post #4 - 2 new positions
      Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 12:18 p.m.
    • Naccel 2 -- post #4 - 2 new positions
      Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 16 January 2010, at 5:15 a.m.
      • Naccel 2 -- post #4 - 2 new positions
        Lucky Jim -- Sunday, 17 January 2010, at 10:10 p.m.
  • Naccel 2 -- post #4
    Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 11:13 a.m.
    • Naccel 2 -- post #4
      Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 9:22 p.m.