BGonline.org Forums

Selection-biased 64

Posted By: Chuck Bower
Date: Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 6:18 p.m.

In Response To: Selection-biased 64 (Matt Cohn-Geier)

Running is out for more than one reason.

Barpoint looks nice.

2*(2) is a possibility. Very stripped. Probably Black has a cube at this score if White fans.

13/5, 8/4*: very pure and plays to Black's strength, but I counted 19 return shots. Black should be avoiding getting a second checker back.

I make the barpoint, but QF says I'm supposed to do something different -- 2*(2)?

Messages In This Thread

• Selection-biased 64
  Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 11:34 a.m.
  • Selection-biased 64
    Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 12:37 p.m.
  • Selection-biased 64
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 4:01 p.m.
  • Selection-biased 64
    Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 4:58 p.m.
  • Selection-biased 64
    Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 6:18 p.m.
    • Selection-biased 64
      Sam Pottle -- Friday, 15 January 2010, at 1:32 a.m.
      • Whew!
        Chuck Bower -- Friday, 15 January 2010, at 2:18 p.m.
  • Selection-biased 64
    Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 14 January 2010, at 7:41 p.m.
  • Selection-biased 64
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 15 January 2010, at 2:27 p.m.
    • Selection-biased 64
      Stick -- Friday, 15 January 2010, at 7:33 p.m.