BGonline.org Forums

More poker, part I (OT)

Posted By: Chuck Bower
Date: Sunday, 7 February 2010, at 12:42 a.m.

In Response To: More poker, part I (OT) (lenny)

You're of course right. And that's the problem with poker: however and whatever you post as a position is never exactly what the players knew at the table. So anyone can justify any action. (Matt R. told me this three or four years ago.)

Obviously you, in particular, even know the players' names. You also must know this is hand 101 of the final table. Thus the players have seen 100 hands played out here, plus any more they could squeeze out of ESPN's coverage of earlier rounds.

Anyone who cares can go look up as much info as he'd like. Have at it. Then tell yourself you knew the right play all along.

Messages In This Thread

• More poker, part I (OT)
  Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 6:46 p.m.
  • More poker, part I (OT)
    lenny -- Saturday, 6 February 2010, at 11:37 p.m.
    • More poker, part I (OT)
      Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 7 February 2010, at 12:42 a.m.
      • More poker, part I (OT)
        Bob Glass -- Thursday, 11 February 2010, at 12:33 a.m.
    • More poker, part I (OT)
      Steve Mellen -- Sunday, 7 February 2010, at 5:53 p.m.
  • More poker, part I (OT)
    Bob Koca -- Sunday, 7 February 2010, at 12:10 a.m.
    • More poker, part I (OT)
      Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 7 February 2010, at 12:33 a.m.
  • More poker, part I (OT)
    dc-ohio -- Sunday, 7 February 2010, at 3:38 p.m.
  • FYI: identity of players
    Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 7 February 2010, at 4:58 p.m.
  • Part II
    Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 7 February 2010, at 7:28 p.m.
    • Part II
      Steve Mellen -- Monday, 8 February 2010, at 5:04 p.m.
      • My analysis, OtB action, etc.
        Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 5:26 p.m.
        • My analysis, OtB action, etc.
          Steve Mellen -- Tuesday, 9 February 2010, at 6:44 p.m.
          • My analysis, OtB action, etc.
            Sam Pottle -- Wednesday, 10 February 2010, at 2:28 a.m.