BGonline.org Forums
I was on appeal committee-rest of the story
Posted By: Bill Finneran
Date: Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 2:19 p.m.
In Response To: Cube ruling #1 (Barry Silliman)
The appeal committee ruled that cube offer was on 4. Not sure if I told Barry that.
Player A (low intermediate) lead 3-2 to 7. Player B (novice) just did not know better. Player should have cubes in the position. Player B should have wnated the cube on 4 to rewhip. The whole situation was ludicris.
Messages In This Thread
- Cube ruling #1
Barry Silliman -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:36 a.m.
- Cube ruling #1
Stick -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:45 a.m.
- Cube ruling #1
David -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:57 a.m.
- Cube ruling #1
Barry Silliman -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 4:11 a.m.
- Cube ruling #1
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 4:37 a.m.
- Cube ruling #1
Jason Lee -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 5:27 a.m.
- Cube ruling #1
Rich Munitz -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 7:29 a.m.
- Cube ruling #1
Max Urban -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 1:50 p.m.
- I was on appeal committee-rest of the story
Bill Finneran -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 2:19 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.