BGonline.org Forums

Cube ruling #2

Posted By: Chuck Bower
Date: Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 5:40 p.m.

In Response To: Cube ruling #2 (Phil Simborg)

One thing unclear in the current US Rules wording, and I think also unclear in this discussion, is whether or not the 'offended' player has an option. I see two choices:

1) If a player makes a motion to turn the cube (but doesn't complete the action), then the cube is turned.

2) If a player makes a motion to turn the cube (but doesn't complete the action), the opponent has his choice of whether or not to require a cube turn or forbid a cube turn (for this turn only).

The reason for the rule is to protect cube receiver from being induced into indicating his likely action in the event of a cube turn, BEFORE potential (re)doubler finalizes his action.

Option 1 above, I believe, negates any advantage the (re)doubler unfairly gains. Therefore, why should cube receiver have any say in the matter?

Messages In This Thread

• Cube ruling #2
  Barry Silliman -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:39 a.m.
  • Cube ruling #2
    Stick -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:46 a.m.
  • Cube ruling #2
    David -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:54 a.m.
    • Cube ruling #2
      Justin N. -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 5:52 a.m.
      • Cube ruling #2
        Stick -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 7:07 a.m.
        • Cube ruling #2
          Barry Silliman -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 12:49 p.m.
          • Cube ruling #2
            Rich Munitz -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:40 p.m.
  • Cube ruling #2
    Jason Lee -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 6:04 a.m.
    • Cube ruling #2
      Justin N. -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 6:42 a.m.
    • Cube ruling #2
      Bob Glass -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 9:43 p.m.
  • Cube ruling #2
    Steve Mellen -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 3:58 p.m.
    • Cube ruling #2
      Rich Munitz -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 4:58 p.m.
      • Cube ruling #2
        neilkaz -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 5:06 p.m.
  • Cube ruling #2
    Bob Glass -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 9:31 p.m.
  • Cube ruling #2
    Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 10:45 p.m.
    • Cube ruling #2
      Stick -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 10:55 p.m.
  • Cube ruling #2
    Tom Keith -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 11:09 p.m.
    • Cube ruling #2
      neilkaz -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 11:27 p.m.
      • Cube ruling #2
        Tom Keith -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 1:09 a.m.
        • Cube ruling #2
          Gregg Cattanach -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 2:45 p.m.
          • Cube ruling #2
            Barry Silliman -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 3:18 p.m.
    • Cube ruling #2
      Stick -- Wednesday, 3 March 2010, at 11:39 p.m.
      • Cube ruling #2
        Barry Silliman -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 1:01 a.m.
      • Cube ruling #2
        Tom Keith -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 1:10 a.m.
        • Cube ruling #2
          Stick -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 1:29 a.m.
  • Cube ruling #2
    Phil Simborg -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 12:05 p.m.
    • Cube ruling #2
      Barry Silliman -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 12:53 p.m.
    • Cube ruling #2
      Gregg Cattanach -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 3:17 p.m.
    • Cube ruling #2
      Tom Keith -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 3:52 p.m.
      • Cube ruling #2
        Henrik Bukkjaer -- Friday, 5 March 2010, at 9:21 a.m.
        • Cube ruling #2
          Tom Keith -- Friday, 5 March 2010, at 10:26 a.m.
    • Cube ruling #2
      Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 5:40 p.m.
      • Cube ruling #2
        Tom Keith -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 7:16 p.m.
        • Cube ruling #2
          Steve Mellen -- Thursday, 4 March 2010, at 7:37 p.m.