BGonline.org Forums

64S-31

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 5:12 p.m.

In Response To: 64S 41 XG 4 ply RO (neilkaz)

Note the similar splitting theme in the sequence below. If you ignore P, you can see that X and H relate similar to Neil's rollout.

64S-31 [X P4.8 H31] - 46k / X (Hit and Split 24-21, 8-7*) [Snowie prefers P]

vs

63S-31 [P H35 X44] - 5k / H (Hit 13-10, 8-7*)

62S-31 [P H42 X55] - 5k

For an explanation, see Nack and Paul's book, positions A12 - A17.

Messages In This Thread

• 64S 41 XG 4 ply RO
  neilkaz -- Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 3:33 p.m.
  • 64S-31
    David Rockwell -- Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 5:12 p.m.
  • 62S-41, 63S-41, and 64S-41 data
    Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 5:37 p.m.
    • 62S-41, 63S-41, and 64S-41 data
      David Rockwell -- Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 6:47 p.m.
      • 62S-41, 63S-41, and 64S-41 data
        neilkaz -- Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 8:38 p.m.
        • 62S-41, 63S-41, and 64S-41 data
          David Rockwell -- Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 8:55 p.m.
          • 62S-41, 63S-41, and 64S-41 data
            Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 14 March 2010, at 3:43 a.m.
  • 64S 41 XG 4 ply RO
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 14 March 2010, at 8:13 p.m.