[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

62S-41, 63S-41, and 64S-41 data

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 5:37 p.m.

In Response To: 64S 41 XG 4 ply RO (neilkaz)

Thanks for the RO, Neil.

Yes, it seems that several experts have been under the impression that H (hit-and-down) is better overall than X (hit-and-split) because they've been looking only at the posted Gnu data. Snowie data is relatively more X-supporting than Gnu by .019, .012 and .010.

Here is money data for the three 6xS-41 positions:

62S-41
Snowie .. [X H4] 10k
GnuBG .. [H X15] 15k .. d[H X7] 15k
XG 3-ply [H X6] 62k

63S-41
Snowie .. [X H3] 10k
GnuBG .. [H X9] 15k .. d[H X3] 5k
XG 3-ply [H=X] 62k

64S-41
Snowie .. [X H14] 20k
GnuBG .. [X H4] 46k .. d[X H4] 15k, g[H X11] 15k
XG 3-ply [X H11] 31k
XG 4-ply [X H9] 15k

XG is acting as a good moderator here, generating a margin midway between Snowie's and Gnu's results (slightly closer to Snowie's).

For those interested, I've also included Gnu data for DMP ("d" before the bracket) and GG ("g"), though keep in mind that some of Gnu's H bias probably carries over from its money result; in particular, it's too early to say which of H or X is better for 63S-41 DMP.

On January 20th, I sent out 62S-41 and 63S-41 for Snowie extension to 20k; I'm waiting to hear back. When I've got those and all three of Neil's XG 4-ply results (I'm hoping he'll roll 62S-41 as well), I'll have another look.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.