BGonline.org Forums

64S 41 XG 4 ply RO

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Sunday, 14 March 2010, at 8:13 p.m.

In Response To: 64S 41 XG 4 ply RO (neilkaz)

Just to point out that if you're trying to make hay out of the magnitude of the difference between 24/20 8/7* and 13/9 8/7* (which here is 0.009), then this rollout is light-years away from being statistically significant. You should probably run it out until the confidence says plus or minus 0.0005, or about ten times tighter than what it is here.

Messages In This Thread

• 64S 41 XG 4 ply RO
  neilkaz -- Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 3:33 p.m.
  • 64S-31
    David Rockwell -- Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 5:12 p.m.
  • 62S-41, 63S-41, and 64S-41 data
    Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 5:37 p.m.
    • 62S-41, 63S-41, and 64S-41 data
      David Rockwell -- Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 6:47 p.m.
      • 62S-41, 63S-41, and 64S-41 data
        neilkaz -- Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 8:38 p.m.
        • 62S-41, 63S-41, and 64S-41 data
          David Rockwell -- Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 8:55 p.m.
          • 62S-41, 63S-41, and 64S-41 data
            Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 14 March 2010, at 3:43 a.m.
  • 64S 41 XG 4 ply RO
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 14 March 2010, at 8:13 p.m.