[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Kazaross/Rockwell MET Formulas

Posted By: Chase
Date: Wednesday, 31 March 2010, at 6:48 a.m.

In Response To: Kazaross/Rockwell MET Formulas (Rich Munitz)

Sorry for the confusion. What I meant is I rounded the result I got from the formula. So if I plugged in the values and came up with a result of 56.68, I rounded that up to 57 before comparing it to the entry in the MET. In addition, I used a rounded-off version of the R-K MET. This means it's quite possible that somewhere along the way I compared a formula result of, say, 72.51 (which I rounded up to 73) to a MET entry of 72.49 (which was rounded down to 72) and reported that the formula was off by 1% for that entry when in reality it was spot on. Obviously this isn't ideal, which is why I noted it and included a disclaimer, but it was close enough for my purpose, which was to get a feel for the relative strength of the formulas in order to make a decision about which I'd use.

In case anybody's keeping score at home, I decided to stick with Neil's Numbers, settling for a bit less accuracy, but a lot less OTB calculation, which is not my strong suit.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.