BGonline.org Forums

65R-41 4 ply rollout

Posted By: Bob Koca
Date: Monday, 3 May 2010, at 5:08 a.m.

In Response To: 65R-41 4 ply rollout (neilkaz)

The long gnu RO's here have $ better by .0084 for 65R-41 and better by .0060 for 65R - 51. Is it reasonable to assume that the XG rollout will also make splitting relatively better by about .085 putting S in the lead for 51 reply? How about for 21 reply, will split also catch up by about .0085 (leaving $ still best by a decent amount) ?

Messages In This Thread

• 65R-41 4 ply rollout
  neilkaz -- Monday, 3 May 2010, at 2:58 a.m.
  • 65R-41 data
    Nack Ballard -- Monday, 3 May 2010, at 4:08 a.m.
    • 65R-41 — Gammon Save — 2-ply GnuBg Rollout
      Taper_Mike -- Friday, 14 September 2012, at 12:34 a.m.
  • 65R-41 4 ply rollout
    Bob Koca -- Monday, 3 May 2010, at 5:08 a.m.
    • 65R-41 4 ply rollout
      Stick -- Monday, 3 May 2010, at 5:19 a.m.
    • GnuBG rollouts' slot bias
      Nack Ballard -- Monday, 3 May 2010, at 7:33 a.m.
  • 65R-41$-41
    Paul Weaver -- Monday, 3 May 2010, at 3:36 p.m.
    • 65R-41$-41
      David Rockwell -- Monday, 3 May 2010, at 4:04 p.m.
      • 65R-41$-41
        Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 3 May 2010, at 4:14 p.m.
      • 65R-41$-41
        neilkaz -- Monday, 3 May 2010, at 7:40 p.m.
    • 65R-41$-41
      Nack Ballard -- Monday, 3 May 2010, at 7:18 p.m.
  • 65R-41 4 ply rollout
    Nack Ballard -- Monday, 3 May 2010, at 7:34 p.m.